Some people think vertical city is the best 雅思写作城市类7分范文
这道题目首次出现在2017年2月16日,要求大家探讨垂直城市和水平城市哪个更好。前者无疑能够容纳更多的人口,适应当今城市化的潮流;而后者则空间更大,环境更好,居住起来更加舒适。
雅思写作大作文题目
Some people think ‘vertical city’ is the best, where people live and work in tall buildings. Others think ‘horizontal city’ is better, where there are fewer tall buildings. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
一些人认为人们生活和工作在高楼中的垂直城市是最好的,而其他人则认为高层建筑更少的水平城市要好一些。讨论双方观点并给出你自己的意见。
雅思写作城市类7分范文
开头段
In recent years, the concept of urban development has sparked a lively debate between proponents of the ‘vertical city’ and the ‘horizontal city’ models. While some argue in favor of tall buildings as the epitome of modern urban living, others contend that a more balanced and spacious approach is preferable. This essay will analyze both perspectives before offering my own opinion on the matter.
垂直城市能够有效利用空间
On the one hand, advocates of the ‘vertical city’ model highlight its potential to efficiently utilize limited urban space. Rapid urbanization and population growth have led to soaring demands for housing and office spaces, particularly in densely populated regions. This article is from laokaoya website. Tall buildings, such as skyscrapers, can accommodate a significant number of residents and businesses in a relatively small area. For example, cities like New York and Hong Kong have successfully embraced vertical development to accommodate their burgeoning populations, making efficient use of available land and reducing urban sprawl. Moreover, vertical cities often provide a sense of vibrancy, with bustling streets and a mix of commercial and residential spaces that foster a strong sense of community and economic activity.
水平城市有助于人与自然和谐共存
Conversely, proponents of the ‘horizontal city’ model argue that a focus on tall buildings can lead to overcrowding and loss of green spaces. Horizontal cities promote a more harmonious coexistence between human habitation and nature. By spreading buildings outwards, these cities can maintain larger open spaces, parks, and recreational areas that enhance the quality of life for their residents. The ‘horizontal city’ approach also mitigates issues of congestion and pollution that can plague densely packed urban centers. Cities like Amsterdam and Copenhagen exemplify the successful implementation of this model, where cycling-friendly streets, ample green spaces, and an emphasis on a balanced lifestyle contribute to residents’ well-being.
两者结合才是最佳方案
In my opinion, while both models have their merits, a hybrid approach that blends elements of vertical and horizontal development could yield the most favorable outcomes. Tall buildings can play a crucial role in meeting the demands of rapid urbanization, maximizing land use efficiency, and fostering economic growth. Simultaneously, preserving open spaces, promoting sustainable architecture, and maintaining a connection with nature should remain paramount. By striking a balance between vertical and horizontal development, cities can offer residents the benefits of both models without compromising on essential aspects of urban living.