雅思口语Part2话题卡:Describe a disagreement you had with someone 与他人的争论
思路点拨:以下思路仅供参考,希望大家能结合自己的经历编写答案
日常生活中的争论有很多。我们可能因为寝室打扫卫生或者关灯时间跟室友产生争执,可能因为专业选择问题、花钱习惯跟父母产生争论,可能因为对某一问题的看法与老师产生争论,也可能因为工作职责分配而跟同事或者老板产生争论。这些争论不必影响很大,只要大家意见不一致即可。
题目
Describe a disagreement you had with someone
You should say
Who you had the disagreement with
What the disagreement was
What happened
And how you felt about it
参考答案
下面给老烤鸭小编根据具体的题目要求,给出的原创参考答案:
请北京新航道,上海新航道,沈阳新航道,小站雅思,阿卡索外教网,百利天下留学以及智课网等机构不要再次抄袭本站的文章。
I am going to tell you about a disagreement I had with my roommate Xiaoming. It was about a year ago, when my city suddenly announced that to mitigate air pollution, from December 1st, 2021, it would restrict the use of private vehicles based on even-and odd-numbered license plates.
我要跟你说的是我跟我室友小明之间的一场争执。大约一年前。我的城市突然宣布,为了减轻空气污染,从2021年12月1日开始,它将开始实行单双号限行。
Once this piece of information was released, it sparked a lot of controversies. Xiaoming was an ardent supporter, who argued that since private vehicles contributed most of the pollutants in the atmosphere, this policy should be able to improve the air quality significantly and thus lower the risk of getting respiratory diseases, which were becoming increasingly prevalent among children and senior citizens. So we should support it.
这则消息一经发布就引发巨大的争议。小明是它热切的拥护者。他认为由于私家车贡献了大气中大部分的污染物,该政策应该能够显著提升空气质量,并因此降低患上呼吸道疾病的风险。这种疾病在孩子和老年人中越来越常见。所以我们应该支持它。
I, on the other hand, focused on the negative sides of this policy. Firstly, the government did not implement supporting measures, like increasing the shifts of public transport, which inevitably caused long queues at bus stops and subway stations. This article is from laokaoya website. Secondly, it only scratched the surface of the problem and did not eradicate the root. As long as we consumed fossil fuels, the issue of air pollution would continue to perplex us.
另一方面,我则关注这一政策的缺点。首先,政府没有采取配套措施,比如增加公共交通的班次,这必然会导致公交车站和地铁站排起长队。其次,它只触及问题表面,并没有消除其根源。只要我们继续使用化石燃料,空气污染的问题就将继续困扰着我们。
The argument was solved in a funny way. Just when we were expressing our opinions eagerly, another roommate of mine said it sounded as if both of you had owned cars and would be affected by this policy, which immediately shut us up. But I actually thought this argument was pretty intriguing. It inspired you to think about the conflict between personal and public interests, and short-term and long-term goals.
这一争论以一种搞笑的方式得以解决。正当我们热切地表达自己的观点的时候,我的另一个室友说道,听起来就好像你们两个已经有了自己的汽车,并会受到这一政策的影响一样。这直接让我们闭嘴。但事实上,我觉得这一争论很有启发。它让你思考个人利益与公共利益,短期目标和长期目标之间的冲突。
Part 3 追加问题
What would you do if you disagree with someone?
How do we stop an argument from escalating into a fight?
Who do you think should teach children to respect their teacher?
What disagreements do parents and children usually have?